Best Audio Hookup for Blu-Ray player to non-HDMI receiver.? - audio hookups with non hdmi receiver
I have an older Denon receiver (1602) - no HDMI. I have optical output of my new Samsung LCD TV to the receiver. Sound from your satellite receiver dish sounds perfect, especially with the central dialogue channel. Crisp, rich and perfect. I have a Samsung Blu-ray player connected directly to the receiver via an optical cable configuration of the second, and Blu-ray "indirect access / audiophile. The sound is good, but not rich, and perfect as the sound characteristics of the court. Every idea Why? Should I to analog cable? Is there a place that I had lost in the Denon? Thank you for your help.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Audio Hookups With Non Hdmi Receiver Best Audio Hookup For Blu-Ray Player To Non-HDMI Receiver.?
6 comments:
About the issue of non-HDMI, the short answer to your question is centered, that connect TOSLINK optical digital / is the best choice hands down in relation to the bit stream between a reader and a digital audio receiver, if anything, the cause.
There are so many possibilities, in almost every model of receiver that is a good chance that there is an option that should be configured.
Or is there a setting that caused the center / dialog very loudly, causing distortions / clip that leads into the music to be buried, and the effects of other speakers (center / dialogue) is too low, or perhaps the playing a mix of disc you are trying to not happen. If that with each new album is certainly a receiver to determine whether the course he plays is good. If it's just a difference in the reproduction, it could be a profit structure and / or question the height difference between the two signaling pathways.
* * We have the quality of the optical connection over copper wire must be taken into account (entered into in another entry, says in essence thattion that the glass is not susceptible to interference, while the copper / analog (and digital SPDIF-copper)).
Digital or AC-3 or DTS is at the low figure in almost imperceptibly, to captures the differences between the PCM or analog master and the advantage of not ringing or noise optical far beyond 00.001% of human ears are sharp enough to hear differences in the AC-3 encoding and DTS analog, compared to a real studio environment that is different to (almost) not the environment can be an analog signal clean enough to be able to compare a brand. Studies looking at ways to all new computers with high-quality analog replace cable.
It may be convenient to refer analog or "losses", but must also include the losses of the line, the quality of analog cable (there is virtually no such thing as an analog cable * really * is a signal without altering it in any way ), and many other factors that are not a problem that does not have an optical digital output connection.
JuAnd one more question here is:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Ambm2XJk9M4MmnvZB1gMS27sy6IX; _ylv = 3? qid = 20090531134317AAKnjPo profile & show = 7 #-info-AA11724410
I do not know why it does not sound very good, but it is possible that Dish Network was "sweetened" the audio compression and equalization at its best in traditional TV. Or perhaps it is only Dolby Surround, which is actually 2 channels.
In any case, can be achieved with a loss of 5.1 surround sound via optical cable and regular Dolby Digital or DTS. Or could two channels of lossless audio, using Dolby Prologic surround.
The best solution is to use the RCA outputs 5.1 in the Blu-ray, if necessary, and run 5.1 and inputs on the receiver. This allows the complete loss of audio quality.
I agree with the previous post, unless you're willing to quite a heavy analog audio cable, optical court is the best choice and a Denon receiver must be better than most players anyway convert BR. The problem could be that much prefer the sound of compressed satellite television, can as cool by some listeners. I suggest testing with the audio settings in the Denon, it can be paid at a predetermined value, which gives the sound desirable.
Blue Ray Disc Check adjustment uotput such as HDMI, optical, etc. and see if it helps. Optical is the best hook for digital, you can try the analog cable (it is also necessary to check the manual for connecting analog set in the floppy drive). Or you can use your receiver with an HDMI upgrade, which has.
I have nothing more to offer than the first two types, "he said. I posted to let you know the person above me seemed confused.
You can add more than 5.1 when you send optical indirect (as it does). PCM is, if you take him on two channels. And even if it tries to send 7.1 HD audio (TrueHD and DTS-HD MA) would indirectly reduce the kernel-5.1-Soundtracks for.
Blu-ray compatible with the new lossless audio formats like Dolby True HD and DTS-HD Master Audio. The S / PDIF-format digital fiber optic cable is not compatible with these formats and the receiver is probably only two channels, not 5.1.
Bitstream (Audiophile) format you have selected can not fully be realized via an HDMI cable. If you choose indirect (re-encoding) instead, I think you will dramatically improve the audio search.
But if you want the best sound quality, yes, you have to switch to analog cable. Buy 6 x RCA analog outputs and connect the player to the inputs on your receiver EXT. Here is one:
http://www.araccessories.com/araccessori ...
You can find this cable, or an equivalent of about U.S. $ 15-20 if you are buying.
I have is an old Yamaha receiver, and, as I my Samsung Blu-ray (BD-P2500) was connected, lossless audio sounds great.
Post a Comment